And it may chew into frequencies you might not deem problematic. I even will place Soothe2 on my mix bus to gently tighten up a full mix.īut once in a while Soothe2 can be overeager. And most of the time adjusting just this one knob is enough to rein in an unruly track. From there you can globally decide how hard it digs into your track with its Depth control. It's like a mix engineer's personal EQ homing missile!įrom the moment you place Soothe2 on a track, it gets right to work in reducing the levels of resonances. Oh no, Soothe2 will chase resonances where ever they try to hide. But unlike static or even dynamic EQs, Soothe2 doesn't camp out on a single set frequency. Or to put it another way, Soothe2 is a "deresonator." It actively and instinctually finds overbearing frequencies and tucks them down where they belong. Soothe2 takes erratic and unpredictable frequencies and eradicates them. This is why oeksound's Soothe2 is my must-have processor to complement Logic's toolkit. And where there's one resonance, there's usually more to contend with. But the results are often only "okay" at best. Of course one could automate an EQ band to wander about playing whack-a-mole. That is until you have a resonance howling and floating around the frequency spectrum like some ghoul. For example, Logic's Channel EQ is great. Plugins that adapt to audio in that way that only computers can. So if Logic has it all, why even indulge the "desert island" plugin question? Well, an area I feel Logic Pro has yet to address is the world of dynamic/smart processors. And best of all, I've been delighted (and reminded) by how much amazing value lives in Logic's native tool kit. And the benefits have been tremendous! Less plugin menu diving. Since then, I've eliminated 90% of the plugins living on my system. But did I really need most of them? I decided to find out. Even if we are only talking hypothetically.īut as it turns out, I decided to hold my feet to the fire of this very question last year. There's just something so intriguing and insightful (and fun!) about restricting one's options down to the bare essentials. Yet I for one am eager to see what my colleagues have lined up for this latest Expert Panel. We've all seen it play out again and again on websites and forums. Chris VandeviverĪh, the proverbial "desert island" plugin question. Our panel consists of Chris Vandeviver from, Edgar Rothermich, known for his graphically enhanced Logic and Pro Tools manuals, Maurice Chevalier, moderator of several Logic Pro-related Facebook groups, myself, groove3 trainer Eli Krantzberg, and Apple certified T3 Logic trainer and educator Eddie Grey. We've assembled the expert panel once again, this time to answer the unanswerable: If you could only use one single third-party Audio Unit effects processing plug-in to augment Logic's already great arsenal, which would it be, and why? Which plug-in would you not be able to do without when mixing? However, the bottom line remains, Logic unquestionably provides us with everything we need to get the job done. And of course, there are some that we reach for all the time. Most of us have plug-in folders full of redundant Audio Units that we barely touch. Succumbing to the temptation of the latest, most incredible effects processing plug-ins is difficult to resist. However, the appeal of third-party Audio Unit plug-ins to augment our mixing tools is a strong pull that is difficult to avoid. With the choice of multiple EQs, compressor models, modulation processing, and reverbs provided, we have everything we need to create a first-rate pro mix. We all know how great Logic's native plug-ins are.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |